In a journey to know about latest developments in technology and to know about young entrepreneurs, I came across most tenacious GenZ founder and CEO of ‘Coinbooks’mr Arnav Bathla

Mr Arnav Bathla played a critical role  in developing infrastructure to automate crypto- accounting invoicing and payrolls for big enterprises dealing with digital assets.

Mr Arnav built the most extensive crypto accounting software for the companies which simplify digital asset accounting process with advanced integrations and customizable features.

More and more companies are choosing‘Coinbooks’ as go to platform to manage all their crypto accounting, crypto payroll and crypto invoicing needs.

Through Mr Arnav’s innovative idea of extensive crypto accounting software, companies with billions of transactions are being benefiting for supporting high volumes and time saved is 1-40 hrs/week (based on transaction volume)

These days Mr Arnav’s company Coinbooks is a leading financial infrastructure for crypto that is being used by many leading customers like Layer3, ThirdWeb, Pointer,Xero,Quickbooks, Sage,FreeAgent, clearbooks Media Center,myob to name few

Mr Arnav’s extraordinary ability of problem solving,technical talent, vision and most importantly his grit lead to this remarkable journey of entrepreneurship.

Mr Arnav is an individual of extraordinary ability who after building best crypto accounting software at age 21, successfully raised $3.2 million within span of 3 months with support from world class investors like Lattice Capital, Founders, Inc. Multicoin Capital and Polygon’s very own founders. Arnav’s company, Coinbooks was also accepted into Silicon Valley’s Y-Combinator program and participated in summer 2022 batch and funded by Y-Combinator.

Remarkable journey of Mr Arnav’s software creation n establishing ‘Coinbooks’ is of phenomenal value to save valuable asset ‘time’.

While already successful, he is continuing to add significant value to the product and is providing high level of service and professionalism to all the prestigious enterprises.

Factors such as resilience and energy are his timeless traits.





17th September 2022: Manchester, UK


GMC’s appointed panel today was dismissed, admitting that they had been threatened to pursue the case and to implicate Dr Prashant Jindal. They admitted that they were under threat and hence were also biased sun-consciously. This was a historic admission that has never been done in the GMC in the past, and happened due to pressure from Dr.Jindals legal team, which now stands vindicated. They had asserted from the start, that the whole case was a fraud and the panel was GMC was biased to even bring this to the hearing, due to pressure of BBC. The entire case was brought to the tribunal by a reporter from the BBC, Ms. Nicola Dowling, admitted in writing.


This opens a full Pandora’s box of what happens behind the scenes in the GMC. It has been long alleged that the GMC machinery is hugely biased against Asian and African doctors and is used as a conduit to settle personal scores, which was more than evident in this case.


She brought fake patients and evidence that was admitted by GMC due to her connections, memos, and evidence of which shared in previous posts. Seeing that she was losing the case, and was unable to prove the charges, and on the third day of the hearing realizing that her fake patients were exposed, her team approached the Panel/Jury members in their hotels threatening them with dire consequences on social media bullying if they exonerated Dr Prashant Jindal. 


The jury did not admit this in full and to the bias, and instead of recusing, shamelessly, postponed the hearing by three months,  putting everybody in limbo. It took them another three months to finally arrive and have the guts to admit that the entire case was based on coerced witnesses, threats to the Jury and numerous manipulation to the FTP panel done, all executed by BBC reporter, Ms.Nicola Dowling and her team, known for extortions. Many people have published articles about them. One of the articles can be read here.


The CEO of BBC was contacted (letter shared in the last post), and a senior manager has replied on his behalf, that they find nothing wrong in Ms. Nicola Dowling‘s actions and fully support her in every way. 


Over £250k has already been spent on the case by the legal bills plus the GMC’s time, losses of the doctors, public time, and many more. The GMC & the BBC have a lot to answer.

Keep tuned for further updates 

Medscape has reported that an eight-year-old boy, who is the son of a leading eye surgeon in UK, Dr Prashant Jindal, has become the youngest eye surgeon in the world. As per the report in Medscape, Dr.Jindal allowed his son in 2016 of doing his surgery, whilst he was away in Spain. Dr.Jindal’s son was 8 years old then. This is a new world record, reported by Medscape.


The patient, a boxer, Greg Brady, claims he was approached by the BBC journalist, Nicola Dowling, telling him this and that they would get the case filed in the GMC. He also claimed to be blind and posted some fake photos but real photos were dug out of him flaunting his vision and body and driving cars post-surgery.



Greg Brady faked injuries wearing wet Kitchen towel to say his blind until image surfaced unearthed his images of driving cars.

It also says that Dr.Jindal also allowed his assistant in 2011 to perform surgery on another patient, who was brought to the GMC by the same BBC journalist. This patient, Mr.Sandy Miller, is a leading skiing expert with perfect vision and teaching skiing to high end clients who Medscape claims was operated by Dr.Jindal’s unqualified assistant, whose age is not confirmed. It also states that Dr.Jindal was in Spain at the same time.




During the hearing, the GMC barrister pressed that Dr.Jindal was not present in surgery but his son and/or his assistant’s son did the surgery. No evidence was provided for such interesting allegations except for patient saying he is sure and then changed his statement. Initially claiming that he never met Dr.Jindal later said, he met him and they did sign the forms together but that because he did not hear the voice. The exact same case was tried against a local doctor, Brett H by the same reporter but dismissed by the GMC. However, when filed against Jindal P, it was instantly taken to a hearing.


Not finishing there, the panel members were threatened by the litigants, led by BBC Journalist, Nicola Dowling, to rule against Dr.Jindal . The GMC has admitted that the panel were approached by the BBC’s Nicola Dowling.


The hearing was wrapped up in under 3 days but the judgment not done in 7 further days and then postpone to September 2022. The Twitter is in splits with the case.


Stay tuned for more.


BBC manager has threatened me with dire consequences and besides the email below, I have been receiving numerous phone calls of threats.

I have been covering the story of an Asian doctor, Dr.Prashant Jindal who has been targetted by a BBC team. I also wrote to the BBC CEO, with allegations and shared the articles ( ) that its unethical for reporters to be doing such stuff against doctors, for personal interests. Instead of taking Ms.Nicola Dowling to task, I have been receiving threats online and via phone calls. My Twitter account has been suspended due to the attack by BBC. It is also possible they harm me in many other ways and even take this website down but I request you to follow the truth and I request Asian doctors to stand up against the injustices.

We are very pained to learn the plight of things and I will continue to report the truth as long as I live. I don’t live life in fear. My main Twitter account was hacked, spammed, and taken off thinking but we will keep presenting the truth.





Here is my email to the CEO of BBC UK: 

My email to the BBC:
From: Sumeet Verma
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 at 12:34
Subject: FAO Mr. Tim Davie: Article on BBC’s racist & personal attacks on an Indian origin doctor
To: Tim Davie (CEO)
Cc: Nick Wilcox (Head of Legals)
Dear Mr. Davie
This is Sumit here, a Reporter from Press Trust of India, PTI. I have been working on a case involving an Indian doctor on which your colleague, Ms.Nicola Dowling has been working for a long time. I enclose the link to an article we have recently published in the Indian press although a fuller version will be published soon in the next few weeks. We have a plethora of further evidence in this regard.
Please confirm if you have authorized this operation of Ms. Dowling. The matter is very serious and all ethical, as well as legal rules regarding reporting, have been broken by your colleague Ms. Dowling. She has not contacted Accuvision even once or taken the version but seemingly doing things correctly for personal interests along with her partner, Ms. Sasha Rodoy who is a known extortionist, a detailed account of which we will be publishing as well soon. Ms.Dowling has deliberately provided wrongful information and been coaching patients to lie in the clinic and court, evidence of which will be made available soon.
Please see Ms.Dowling’s posts online regarding the doctor in which she has made numerous personal attacks including commenting on the color of his hair, the car he drives, the accent he speaks, and many other racist remarks, besides numerous personal attacks, showing personal vendetta and hatred and at every point. 
Links: redacted 
Ms. Rodoy has openly mentioned her partnership with Ms.Dowling. Both of them have personally approached the jury during and after the hearing to try and influence them to give a judgment against the doctor (documented and can be confirmed by you by simply asking Ms.Dowling) and police action is sought against them. This also amounts to an abuse of power for racial reasons, an abuse of the power that the media has given her. She is abusing it for her personal vendetta and hatred, besides making money from it as Ms.Rodoy (and Ms.Dowling) get a %age of the compensation in the case in claims court. Everything is recorded in the transcript as well as court documents, a copy of which are available with us under FOI in the public interest.
Also, Ms.Dowling has personally written to the GMC on behalf of the patients to launch this case against the doctor and not done her investigations and broken many protocols, which many believe are due to racism and her personal issues against the doctor and the clinic, which is owned by Asians.
I request you to kindly provide your stance and any comments on this, ideally before we publish further. I am also enclosing my id here along for your reassurance that this is being dealt with professionally and is at the highest level in the PTI. I am also sharing 2-3 documents from our bundle of them for your perusal before commenting.
I look forward to your reply soon.
Kindest regards
Sumeet Verma
Press Trust of India



Reply from BBC:

For the attention of Sumeet Verma: I write in response to your email addressed to Tim Davie.

The BBC is a public service broadcaster which supports accurate journalism which is in the public interest. As such, the organisation would never seek to limit anyone’s right to report upon matters freely, but we are concerned a number of the claims you have made are untrue and defamatory.

Journalists are entitled to attend Medical Practitioners Tribunal hearings and to report upon matters as considered editorially appropriate. As Nicola Dowling’s line manager, I am satisfied there is no substance to the allegations of wrongdoing you make against her. Please confirm the name of the editor from the Press Trust of India who commissioned the pieces you have sent to us and/or the name of your line manager at the organisation.

Yours sincerely

Clare Fordham

Senior News Editor, BBC News


This was followed by a barage of phone calls which are coming every day and some of my close friends approached too.

A gang of extortionists planted patients, coached them & brought fake cases to the General Medical Council & then approached jury members to give judgment against the top eye surgeon of the UK, Dr. Prashant Jindal

Location: Manchester UK, June 2022. Minutes of the public hearing, attended in person by our Manchester correspondent:

Dr. Prashant Jindal is respected as one of the best refractive eye surgeons in the UK, and is responsible for many game-changing innovations in the field, treating the most complex of cases and celebrities from Hollywood to heads of state to Olympic champions, besides being a best-selling author. Besides, he worked six days a week throughout the pandemic but was taken to GMC for being too sincere to his patients and work.


A team led by Ms. Nicola Dowling, about whom a lot of articles have recently surfaced is also involved in vexatiously bringing fake cases against him. The purpose is to extort huge sums of money from doctors with a parallel compensation claim filed and the GMC case is to build pressure to settle. Dowling chased Dr.Jindal for years but being unable to find a single clinical issue against him, her strategy changed to planting a non-clinical issue.


Dowling then found two patients (operated on in 2011 & 2016 resp) & provided them with audio-visual recording equipment. She coached them to visit Dr.Jindal’s clinic, and lodge false complaints but not to allow any examination of their eyes (all evidence available with us and will be available on our website).


Nicola Dowling of BBC also lodged false complaints with the police of fraud to incite an arrest. Parallelly, a false compensation claim in court was filed, and offers were sent via solicitors to settle by paying up, which Dr.Jindal refused to and opted to fight in court.

Dr Prashant Jindal with the legend, Shane Warne

Seeing that Dr. Prashant Jindal was tough to break, Dowling’s team wrote to the GMC that she represented two patients who allege that Dr.Jindal was not present during their surgery and was out of the country during that period and that his son possibly did their surgeries. Despite no cogent evidence, the GMC entertained these seemingly vexatious and personal complaints and ordered a full court hearing on the matter.


A complete well planned 3-prong attack was adopted by the BBC team and offers to settle with money were sent again. The patient’s names have been disclosed by Dowling’s team herself in their blog.

Sandy Miller, the first patient, is a skiing instructor in Switzerland, a high-end sport needing precision vision ( ). He had been openly blackmailing (evidence made available), asking for money from the clinic, at the behest that there was cheaper treatment available at the time and he paid more. He first lodged a complaint in the General Optical Council, the GOC against Dr.Jindal’s assistant, to blackmail for payment and then later apologized to him for making a false complaint (apology letter available with us).

Dr Prashant Jindal & his patient, leading Hollywood star, Anthony (Tony) Robbins


Dowling then wrote to the GMC on Miller’s behalf to start a hearing against Dr. Jindal stating that Miller’s eyes were fine, Dr. Jindal did not operate on him. No evidence was provided on this and no reason was discernible why Miller realized this 7 years after surgery and never mentioned this in hundreds of his emails in these 7 years seeking £500 refund on a price match. During the hearing, a lot of loopholes in Millers’ stories were found including him admitting that he knew Dr Jindal was his surgeon (earlier denied) and that he was consented by Dr.Jindal, but that he believed that there were two people in the room. He admitted that he could not see either of those two people during surgery, but that Dr. Jindal’s voice came from his foot side during surgery and the voice from behind his head was that of a Pakistani accent, which was Dr Jindal’s assistant. He hence built a story that this was the reason that he hence believed Dr Jindal did not do his surgery.


During cross-examination, Miller was caught out & blurted out that actually there were three people in the room including Dr.Jindal. When asked why he said two people initially, he stated that he meant he meant “two significant” people upon which even the jury was shocked and the manipulation was on the wall. GMC’s own expert confirmed that there was no way Miller could see Jindal or his assistant during surgery due to the nature of the surgery.


Miller was asked if he saw Dr Jindal’s son or his assistant doing surgery on him, to which he stated that how could he see anybody during the time of his own eye surgery!! Moreover, in 2011, when Miller’s surgery occurred, Dr.Jindal’s son was 4 years old and unlikely to have done the surgery, as reported in various news articles.


The second patient, Patient-B, was a carpenter turned boxer, Greg Brady. He claimed that Dr. Jindal was in Spain when he was operated upon and that he realized this a few years later when watching an interview of Dr.Prashant Jindal on TV. He said that he has gone blind and presented pictures of massively injured eyes and face, which are found to be post-boxing injuries. Dowling & her team had earlier lodged false complaints with the police about same issue and owing to pressure from the BBC, the Metropolitan police appointed its top detectives on the unbelievable case.


Sadly for Brady and Dowling, videos were found of Mr.Brady walking perfectly well on the busy streets of London. These videos were played in the hearing and left the entire public gallery in the hearing shell-shocked (copies of the video to be shared soon). Also found were numerous pictures posted by Mr.Brady on social media showing how happy and clear-visioned he was after his eye surgery. Although he removed the photos when lodging the false complaint, these were dug out online from google cache (Brady was shown and asked about them in court- to which no plausible answer was available). Pictures included him driving sports cars after surgery, mentioning his great vision, taking dogs for a stroll, and almost another 100 pictures from social media post-surgery. He had also posted Instagram posts with semi-nude pictures of himself saying that he was feeling on top of the world and on cross-examination mentioned “I am vain- what’s your problem.”


Sufficient evidence was also found that Dr.Jindal was in the country and operated on him and another ten patients the same day. Eight months later, the police dismissed the case, but surprisingly, took no action against Mr.Brady for the false complaint.


He was cross-examined on these by Dr.Jindal’s lawyers and conceded that they were his pictures and clicked after surgery. On being asked “How could you walk in the streets of London as seen in the video”, he answered “I walk with my legs, not with my eyes”, breaking the media gallery into laughter. Brady knew his game was over.


Dr.Jindal’s lawyers provided all the above evidence to the GMC, including that of police along with CCTV footage, photos, and witnesses of him being in the country and of operating on the day. However, despite the plethora of evidence, the GMC refused to dismiss the case.


GMC appointed a leading eye surgeon as an expert on the cases, whose reports on both cases (copies available with us) confirmed that there was no lack of care or duty and that the treatment was done perfectly by Dr.Prashant Jindal.


The case was filed by GMC in MPTS (Medical Practitioners Tribunal), a court that belongs to and is accountable to the GMC. Instead of protecting the truth and investigating, the GMC instead sued the doctor in its own court and appointed a prosecution lawyer to do his utmost to erase the doctor from the register.


The hearing was widely published and was attended by all leading media houses. Both patients admitted during their evidence that they were set up by the BBC & were provided audio-visual recording equipment by Ms.Dowling and coached on extracting something that she could use. All the BBCs recordings were played and showed the patients to be guilty of misleading the court, leaving a pale Ms. Dowling in the middle of the hearing.


The GMC fielded the top & highest-paid barrister of the country, as the prosecutor, who without any evidence, alleged that Dr.Jindal was not in the country during surgery and that all his defense evidence & documents, including even the credit card statements, were false. He had regular meetings with BBC’s Ms. Dowling throughout the hearing, something completely against the norms.


On the last day of the hearing, instead of giving the judgment, the jury informed that during the course of the hearing, all members of the jury had been repeatedly approached by Nicola Dowling’s team in their hotel, and also through emails & through their social media accounts and were threatened to give judgment against Dr. Jindal or face media attacks. Dr Jindal’s lawyer stated that if this was a criminal court, Ms.Dowling and her colleague, Sasha Rodoy, should have been arrested (not done so far).


The judgment has been delayed till September due to the approaches of Dowling’s team to influence the judgment. Interestingly, despite us attending, we were not aware of this complaint of the jury, but only found out after Dowling’s team published it on their blog and we then cross checked it with the GMC by calling them, who confirmed. However, despite numerous emails, they have not provided reasons for the same and we have made a FOI legal request now.



Despite numerous efforts, Dr.Jindal did not reply. We then contacted Ms.Dowling’s boss and received a threatening email asking for my manager’s details and threatening me with a defamation suit. We also contacted a doctor who is endorsed by Ms. Dowling’s colleague, Sasha Rodoy. Instead of the doctor, we received a reply from his lawyer threatening us though agreeing that the colleague Sasha Rodoy had close connections with them for years.


It is noteworthy that despite only about 5% of the doctors in the UK being Asians (mainly Indians & Pakistanis), they account for almost 50% of the MPTS cases. Many doctors are unable to afford or fight against the powerful GMC and surrender their registration rather than fighting back. Support is pouring in for Dr. Prashant Jindal from all quarters who has stood his ground with defiance and dignity.


The acceptance of such an unbelievable case in the GMC, thanks to the efforts of Nicola Dowling of the BBC, opens the floodgates to a flurry of cases as it legitimizes vexatious complaints that any patient 10 years down the line can allege that his surgeon did not operate on him but it was the surgeon’s assistant or the surgeon’s son who did it and seek millions in compensation. The GMC, UK will fully support the allegations and fight tooth and nail to prove the person right and the doctor wrong.


Sumeet Verma

The Right Twist